Re: Introducing : Brand-new Internet Protocol "Five Fields"

On 12/10/15 5:32 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 5:00 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> > I think this topic may be not appropriate for this list, unless it is 
> > submitted as an IETF ID.
> I'm always glad to see active seargant-at-arms efforts, attending to
> mailing list propriety.
>
> But I cannot guess at the basis for claiming Eromenko's posting was
> inappropriate.  What policy or documented practice does it violate?
>
> I am not aware of any IETF or ietf mailing list requirement that a new
> topic first have an I-D before it is 'proper' to discuss it.
+1.  It used to be the case where we could actually have substantive
discussions on this list.

Eliot

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature