Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input

On 5/25/16 10:44 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 5/25/16 12:36 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> > It's probably easier to enumerate who's excluded than who's included:
> No, it's still not really working.
>
> Would we, for example, be willing to meet in a place that
> criminalizes Muslims or Jews or Hindus?  I sincerely hope not,
> and I don't think that we would.
Criminalizes?  Probably not.  Makes it difficult for them to adhere to
the precepts of their religion?  We've already done that (perhaps some
of it is unavoidable, by the way).

Eliot

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature