>> XML format and screen readers.
>>
>> I have not looked deeply into the final RFC-format XML spec.
>> Does it already markup SHOULD/MUST/MAY in some useful way?
>> Could it? If it does, should this document point out this?
> That's a good point, and I will look into what this might need to say
> with respect to the XML markup.
Thank you!
I think that markup on these keywords would help screen readers if they learn
to use the XML instead.
I have checked, and I propose this change to the draft:
OLD
=== NEW ===
In many standards track documents several words are used to signify
the requirements in the specification. These words are often
capitalized, as shown below, but they do not have to be. This
document defines how these words are interpreted in IETF documents
when the words are capitalized.
NEW
=== NEW ===
In many standards track documents several words are used to signify
the requirements in the specification. These words are often
capitalized, as shown below, but they do not have to be. This
document defines how these words are interpreted in IETF documents
when the words are capitalized and/or marked as <bcp14> in the
XML source (see [draft-iab-xml2rfc], Section 2.9).
END
The reference to draft-iab-xml2rfc would be informative. Comments?
Barry