On 18/11/2016 05:28, Jari Arkko wrote:
...
But again, these are just my ideas. What do people want that we do?
Speaking for one person only, I do not believe that an IPv6-only network
with NAT64 to reach legacy services is a desirable end point, because it
includes *unnecessary* NAT breakage.
A desirable end-point is a dual stack network (with non-RFC1918 IPv4),
where the amount of IPv4 traffic is very small, tending towards zero.
That includes no NAT breakage.
So I see no argument for changing the current default SSID setup.
(We already have millions of testbeds for the intermediate setup of
a dual-stack network with RFC1918 IPv4; I write this message from
one of those, and it works fine, except for NAT breakage.)
Brian