Re: multihoming, was IPv10
2016-12-31 01:54:57
On 12/30/2016 02:20 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
I wrote:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ohta-e2e-multihoming-00
in April 2000 and I know it is stupid to use source routing for
multihoming.
Is source routing bad in general or is it bad only in multihoming scenarios?
Thanks.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, (continued)
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, John R Levine
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Mark Andrews
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Randy Bush
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, John Levine
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Mark Andrews
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Brian E Carpenter
- RE: multihoming, was IPv10, Michel Py
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Masataka Ohta
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10,
Octavio Alvarez <=
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Stewart Bryant
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Randy Bush
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Jeff Tantsura
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Masataka Ohta
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Masataka Ohta
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, Randy Bush
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, John C Klensin
- Re: multihoming, was IPv10, John R Levine
|
|
|