+1
On 13 Apr 2017, at 14:35, John C Klensin wrote:
I'm opposed to
making _any_ changes in our long-term meeting plans based on
rapidly changing political considerations, including but not
limited to events in the US or UK in the last year. Again, I
think it is important to monitor things as meetings get close
and to have some community consensus about the circumstances
under which we would make significant changes in meeting plans,
but deciding to hold (or not hold) a meeting in the US based on
fears or fantasies about what has happened in the last six
months (or overconfidence about how those things will play 9ut)
and where those things might lead makes no sense to me.