ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Update on feedback on US-based meetings, and IETF 102

2017-04-13 00:23:17

On 13 Apr 2017, at 3:00, Stephen Farrell 
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:


I do not recall the opposite on the list, i.e. someone adamantly
arguing that we ought continue to meet in the US. There were some
mails that I'd say maybe weakly argued for continued US meetings
in the relevant timeframe. But nothing approaching adamant.

Well at this point arguing for more US meetings because I had no trouble 
obtaining a visa and entering the US is the equivalent of stating that I’m a 
white guy and I’m not feeling any racism or sexism.

More to the point, pretty much all US venues work out better than pretty much 
any European let alone Asian venues, weirdly shaped rooms notwithstanding. 
London and Paris come close. Berlin and Prague don’t. This is in terms of 
nearby availability of food (notice the lack of a “OMG where can I get a 
grab-and-go sandwich” thread in 98attendees) and in terms of the availability 
of nearby low-cost hotels. And yes, the fact that everybody speaks English also 
helps. And despite what people think about crime, no IETF-er ever got shot in 
the US during IETF week, but every time we meet in Europe some of us will get 
their pockets picked.

For me, US meetings (Canada’s OK too) are more convenient despite the long, 
tortuous flight. People have been grumbling about US entry procedure for years 
and with good reason. But overall US meetings are simply more convenient. YMMV

Yoav

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>