mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mail-vet-discuss] New draft for review

2007-05-29 16:37:33
At 14:48 29-05-2007, J.D. Falk wrote:
Stepping back for a moment...is there any reason that the identifier can't be 'icannhascheezburger' or some other nonsense, so long as the internal network (and perhaps MUAs which connect to that internal network) knows what to look for?

No. As long as the MUA knows what to look for and when to look for it, that shouldn't be a problem.

If not, then perhaps the answer is that the identifier SHOULD be unique to that network, and it is RECOMMENDED to use the hostname (either real or virtual) of the MTA which determined the contents of the header.

Yes.

Maybe something like "the identifier SHOULD be unique to the trust domain. It is RECOMMENDED to use the hostname of the MTA which performed the authentication tests".

Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>