Re: possible follow-ups

Earl Hood wrote:
> ---Benoit Thillaye du Boullay 
> <Benoit(_dot_)THILLAYE-DU-BOULLAY(_at_)ifp(_dot_)fr> wrote:
>
> >    4/ My personal wish would be a new (boolean) resource that
> >       would tell MHonArc whether or not it should thread messages
> >       with identical subjects.
> This is reasonable.  I did not do one when subject-based detection
> was implemented since there was no user demand at the time to
> have it.  My impression was users always wanted subject-based detection
> since in most cases, there are implied threads with messages with the
> same subject.  In the uncommon case when the like subject messages are
> not part of the same (implied) thread, you just have to accept it.
>
> I.e.  It is all or nothing with subject-based detection.

all right, but would it be hard to have "possible follow-ups" put
outside of the thread ?
a sort of "trust detection" flag :-)

Alexandre
--