Hi,
A lot of us use the "dcc:" header field. It acts like "bcc:" does on most other MUAs. Is there any reason not to add a paragraph about it to the send(1) manpage? Comments? Votes?
+1. Perhaps mention it in the fcc description as an alternative. I found fcc useless for my purposes; it's really handy to have the real message-id, etc. Cheers, Ralph.
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: pick question, Robert Elz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Why not document dcc:?, Neil W Rickert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Why not document dcc:?, Jerry Peek |
Next by Thread: | Re: Why not document dcc:?, Neil W Rickert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |