Re: Why not document dcc:?


Well, really, what we call "dcc" is what other MUAs implement as bcc.
I think that our bcc makes more sense, but it does confuse people.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Why not document dcc:?, Jerry Peek Re: Why not document dcc:?, Ken Hornstein Re: Why not document dcc:?, Robert Elz Re: Why not document dcc:?, Jerry Peek Re: Why not document dcc:?, Ralph Corderoy Re: Why not document dcc:?, Neil W Rickert Re: Why not document dcc:?, Earl Hood Re: Why not document dcc:?, Bill Wohler Re: Why not document dcc:?, Robert Elz Re: Why not document dcc:?, Michael Richardson <=

Previous by Date:	Re: default components file, Glenn Burkhardt
Next by Date:	[Nmh-workers] Welcome to the (new) nmh-workers mailing list, Ken Hornstein
Previous by Thread:	Re: Why not document dcc:?, Robert Elz
Next by Thread:	[Nmh-workers] Welcome to the (new) nmh-workers mailing list, Ken Hornstein
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]