Ken Hornstein wrote:
Also there doesn't seem
to be anything in ChangeLog about this...
Sigh. It was getting late, I had to go home ... I wanted to get
that stuff out there. I'll do the ChangeLog later.
I'd care a lot less about ChangeLog if we had a vcs that let
us look at a sane changelog for the project :-)
And I don't think it will break the debian packaging, because now
the argument to --with-cyrus-sasl is silently ignored.
Oh, OK; that makes sense.
it should still work fine. If it doesn't, let me know
I've just tested, and configure fails with:
checking sasl.h usability... no
checking sasl.h presence... no
checking for sasl.h... no
configure: error: sasl.h not found
because sasl.h is in /usr/include/sasl/sasl.h
I think that's just a trivial error in your AC_CHECK_HEADER
invocation, though.
(I'd forgotten how lousy cvs was until I came back to
nmh; I don't suppose we could get consensus on moving
to a VCS with actual support for atomic commits and
other modern conveniences? :-))
I kinda feel the same way. My vote is for git,
I think git's UI is pretty foul but it has the advantage
that it's rapidly becoming the de-facto DVCS standard.
I could live with it or bzr.
but the REAL question is: where to put it?
You have some reason for wanting to move away from
savannah? (they support arch, bzr, git, mercurial
and svn.)
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers