In the message dated: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:28:22 GMT,
The pithy ruminations from Andreas Wittkemper on
<Re: [Nmh-workers] Dealing with missing From: header during send.> were:
=> On 01/10/12 16:56, bergman(_at_)merctech(_dot_)com wrote:
=>
=>
=> > It seems as if you're talking about composing a reply based on the
=> > identity of the received message.
=> >
=> > I've been using a wrapper around "repl" for about 5 years that will parse
=> > the original message, match the identity against a list, and populate
=> > the reply (From:, Reply-To:, Fcc:, signature) as needed.
=> >
=> > I'm happy to contribute this code (perl) to the list.
=> >
=> > Mark
=>
=> Does your extension do anything about the mime and attachments problem when
you reply to those ?
I try to do a little--tiny--bit of MIME handling:
check for a "text/html" part
check for "application/*" parts
if either is found, use:
/usr/bin/mhshow -type text -type multipart -type message
-nopause -nomoreproc
to attempt to create a 'clean' message as the basis for the
reply
this is semi-successful, crude, and far from universal.
Mark
=> E.g. when you reply to mail with an attachment you will get everything
quoted in your reply mail
=> .
=>
=> Andreas
=>
=>
=> Verizon Deutschland GmbH - Sebrathweg 20, 44149 Dortmund, Germany -
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 14
=> 952 - Geschäftsführer: Detlef Eppig - Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Dominique Gaillard
=>
=>
=>
=> _______________________________________________
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=>
=>
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers