Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:06:34 -0700
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Message-ID: <A4C08EAE-9B21-4D64-98D1-FCE597ECC305@orthanc.ca>
| That sort of statement tends to lead to infamy ...
Not really - there have been invented field names that have given problems,
but none with rational names - sendmail's Apparently-To had all kinds of
problems, but none of them related to someone else using the same name
for some other purpose. Nor has MH's Fcc or Dcc.
Really, just what could "Envelope-From" possibly be, other than the
envelope from value?
Adding stuff like "nmh" in the field name would certainly reduce the
chances of a clash even further, but at the expense of making them
less manageable (for humans to deal with.)
kre
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers