nmh-workers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

2012-03-19 14:52:18

Looking at things ... it may be a simple fix, actually.  I wasn't
envisioning any changes to m_getfld(), that's for sure.
  
Alright, I think I've got a fix in there, and I've got a test which exercises
the bug.  I was right that the fix was simple, but I had to take into
account all of the ways that scansbr.c was used.  The only downside is that
scan may sometimes do an extra read() when it doesn't have to, but that would
only happen if your headers approach the 4k mark (like Steve's).

Ken, sorry, hate to say it, but...

 $ git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/nmh.git
 $ mv nmh nmh-`date +%Y%m%d`
 $ cd nmh-`date +%Y%m%d`
 $ autoreconf
 $ ./configure
 $ make
 $ uip/scan +scan-bug
    1  Fri Mar 16 09:13  Ken Hornstein      Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files | 
Rather than pr
    2  Fri Mar 16 10:35  Ken Hornstein      Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files | 
If we pr
    3  Thu Mar 15 17:43  Jon Steinhart      Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files | 
Jerra
    4  Wed Mar 14 19:32  Nico Kadel-Garcia  Re: wine 1.4 is out | --
    6  Wed Mar 14 10:22  REDACTED           Resolving dependency problems | For 
the last

...SL54 + autoconf 2.68.

steve
--

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>