Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.

Steve wrote:

> Seems like the real problem is that "sortm" shoulda been named
> "sortf".  But I assume that ship sailed a long time ago.

Yes, but given that sortm can sortm can sort specified messages,
it makes sense to me.

How about:
1) change sortm to require msg argument
2) add a sortf that defaults to "all" and exec's sortm

David

_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers