ken wrote:
couldn't find it. I will note that Dcc support is a relatively new
feature compared to group address removal, and is not universally loved
by the greybeards:
revision 1.2
date: 1989/05/03 16:25:05; author: sources; state: Exp; lines: +4 -2
add "Dcc:" header line. This is basically a blind distribution copy.
addresses listed on Dcc: lines are put in the envelope only!
I don't intend to document this since Bcc: is the socially appropriate
header to use for such copies.
/JLR
That's as far back as the files we have under revision control. And just
for the record, my beard is starting to show a few streaks of grey :-)
I don't think there's any objection to documenting this behavior, is there?
I know, it's in the MH Book, but we should have a brief mention of this
in the base man pages.
yes, we certainly should. bcc confused me for years, in that it
was different than the bcc feature i found in other mailers. when
i finally found dcc, it started making sense.
paul
----------------------
paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma,
where it's 36.7 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers