ken wrote:
I ... do not believe it will result in a functional change. I think
that problem exists already. Also ... if you did that, exactly what
are you trying to do, anyway?
I often refile(1) with the source and destination folder the same;
`refile @. 42'. My +inbox is ever growing, ~/bin/sc does a scan of the
last `tput lines` - 1 of messages. If I want to collect emails I'm
about to process to the bottom of my inbox then I `refile @. ...'.
Hm. Does that happen to work with 1.6? I ask because I think you'll
i just tried it, since i do that same operation pretty often. it
works fine.
paul
get a locking failure now, even if you aren't using -retainsequence.
It looks like all folders are opened with locking set ... and I think
that would cause sequence file lock contention. Would be nice to
get that resolved before 1.6 goes out the door.
--Ken
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
----------------------
paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma,
where it's 45.0 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers