On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Ken Hornstein <kenh(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:
Note that I was only suggesting that the timezone be displayed at the
local side, and although I didn't mention it I was only going to suggest
it support IETF-sanctioned timezones. But it seems like there's little
political will for that.
I get that. But where things get trippy is when the sender includes a TZ name
you don't recognize, with no accompanying ±nnnn offset info. Yes, this
violates 822, but I have a lot of mail in my archives with 'BST' in the <zone>
part of the Date header, rather than a ±nnnn token.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers