Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address

Thus said Ralph Corderoy on Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:33:48 +0100:

> abuse(_at_)microsoft(_dot_)com ? I've just tweeted 
> https://twitter.com/outlook to
> ask.

Thanks, however,  given your  interpretation of  the RFC,  it's possible
that this is no longer necessary.

Andy
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 4000000055e6fc4b



_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers