Hi Andy,
abuse(_at_)microsoft(_dot_)com ? I've just tweeted
https://twitter.com/outlook
to ask.
Thanks, however, given your interpretation of the RFC, it's
possible that this is no longer necessary.
No, Microsoft are definitely in the wrong if they are producing emails
*today* that use email addresses like «Dr. Foo <foo(_at_)bar(_dot_)com>» or
«foo.bar <foo(_at_)bar(_dot_)com>». And they need to be told! ;-) Hang on to
any
examples that could be passed to them otherwise I'm going to look a
"someone on the Internet said so" fool.
Cheers, Ralph.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers