Thoughts? I realize this is a significant behavior change
+1. The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in
addition to the existing `Attach'. Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if
the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the
time?
Sigh. I think when we hashed this out last time, the (rough) consensus
was that not puttting in a "Nmh-" prefix was fine. Attach had prior
art (I think mutt used it), and Forward seems to be similarly named.
--Ken
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers