Ralph wrote:
+1. The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in addition to the existing `Attach'. Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the time?
Absolutely. The existing code allows either Nmh-Attach or Attach. We should use only Nmh-Forward here. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |