ken wrote:
Thoughts? I realize this is a significant behavior change
+1. The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in
addition to the existing `Attach'. Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if
the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the
time?
Sigh. I think when we hashed this out last time, the (rough) consensus
was that not puttting in a "Nmh-" prefix was fine. Attach had prior
art (I think mutt used it), and Forward seems to be similarly named.
i vote for presenting the user with a user-friendly component name.
if conflict is an issue, could we make the names of these "special"
headers tuneable via a profile entry?
Nmh-Attach-Component: Attach
Nmh-Forward-Component: Forward
paul
=----------------------
paul fox, pgf(_at_)foxharp(_dot_)boston(_dot_)ma(_dot_)us (arlington, ma,
where it's 45.1 degrees)
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers