Ken writes:
Hm. I don't think we can figure out, without a lot of work, where to place an appropriate format instruction to include a Fcc.
Right, I don't want to change that behavior, anyway.
I think we're all in agreement that the current behavior where it takes the Fcc from the replied-to message is wrong, right? I can't possibly imagine that was desired behavior
How does the attached patch look? It adds a new flag, for use by repl with Fcc. A test case confirms that it solves the problem. David
suppress_fcc_transfer.diff
Description: suppress_fcc_transfer.diff
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Parsing of dot ('.') in name part of address, Ken Hornstein |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Nmh-workers] I did something wrong with replcomps, Valdis . Kletnieks |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] I did something wrong with replcomps, Ken Hornstein |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Nmh-workers] I did something wrong with replcomps, Valdis . Kletnieks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |