Given all this it makes sense to me to start with the model of
of a separate daemon. I think interfacing nmh commands with mhd
will be much simpler than interfacing with a remote imap server.
Personally, I am not convinced this is true. But, please don't let my
concerns stop you! Really, I think at this point any IMAP is better
than no IMAP. The only thing I ask is that you please use the "netsec"
layer for IMAP network communication; I did all of the hard work of
doing the right security stuff in there, and I'd hate to see that work
duplicated.
Yes. Any command that can add/delete/move folders and messsages
will have to talk to mhd. But pick, show, scan don't need to.`
I ... do not believe that is true. Or I am not understanding your
architecture.
At a minimum I want inc working!
I've thought about this carefully, and I believe that in an IMAP world
you would not use "inc". Or at least you wouldn't use it very often
in the normal case. You might be thinking of "refile".
--Ken
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers(_at_)nongnu(_dot_)org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers