Andy Bradford <amb-xmhe@bradfords.org> wrote: >> So, I don't think this is necessarily a nmh problem, like I said. From >> a practical standpoint, you're probably one of the few people who >> actually USES the text/plain content instead of the text/html content. > Count me as another one of those few people who actually uses the > text/plain content. :-) For the most part, I don't read emails that are > HTML only unless I absolutely have to and if there's a text/plain I > manage with that unless it's terrible. I also am like this. And given EFAIL, it seems that we were wise. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Previous by Date: | Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, nmh |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nmh-workers] post 1.71 ug: "long line"/single newline paragraphs, Ralph Corderoy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |