Jonghoon Bae <jhbae(_at_)postech(_dot_)ac(_dot_)kr> wrote:
subscribe
--
______________________________________ ______________________________
J (( |\ | _____ ______ J
H mailto:jhbae(_at_)POSTECH(_dot_)Ac(_dot_)Kr )) | \ | |
|_____) H
B Phone : +82-562-279-2512 (( | \|etwork |eam, |ostech B
A Web : http://postech.ac.kr/~jhbae )) Since 1986, SuperTech 1997 A
E_____________________________________((______________________________E
:?subscribe?,?E_*((_*E? w ! wc
8 49 468
So quoting added 16 bytes, do people think 500 is a better number than
300 in this? I was thinking four lines at 80 chars max, plus a small
buffer for other body content such as "subscribe", list name, and the
address to use. And, I don't want to kill folllowups like this one.
# Stuff that must come before mailing lists
#
# Deal with people who cannot unsubscribe quietly, save for those
# subscribed to my quotes list (which I do by hand)
:0
* ^Subject: *(Re: *)?(please *)?((un)?subsc(ri|ir)be|remove) *(me|now)?!* *$
* ! ^TO(_dot_)*quote(_dot_)*(_at_)qz
{
# Check for small body, allowing some space for a sig
:0B
* < 300
$HOME/notes/untagged
}
Anyone have some suggestions for scoring based on sig length? Assuming
a RFC1036bis sig indicator (^--[ ]$) is fine.
Elijah
------
Please do not CC me when replying to the list. It is not my responsibility to
prove to you my mail is not spam, if mail to you bounces it will not be resent.