Re: Sig length scoring (was Re: subscribe)

On Sat, 31 May 1997, Ben Stuyts wrote:

Just today I received another of those emails with 5 lines of text and a 6 KB 
 
WINMAIL.DAT file uuencoded at the end. Sounds like a similar problem to  
tackle!


:0 HB
*^Content-type: multipart/alternative
/dev/null

Or some equally useful alternative. 

-- 
Quick, sing me the BUDAPEST NATIONAL ANTHEM!!

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
subscribe, W. Wesley Groleau (Wes) An apology and a request, W. Wesley Groleau (Wes) Re: An apology and a request, Professional Software Engineering - Lists account subscribe, Jonghoon Bae Re: subscribe, Eli the Bearded Re: subscribe, era eriksson Sig length scoring (was Re: subscribe), Michael Stone Re: Sig length scoring (was Re: subscribe), Ben Stuyts winmail.dat (was Re: Sig length scoring), Vincent Lefevre Re: Sig length scoring (was Re: subscribe), Wotan <= Re: Sig length scoring (was Re: subscribe), David W. Tamkin

Previous by Date:	Failure of fgrep?, Wotan
Next by Date:	ProcLog 2.8 Beta Released, Aaron D. Turner
Previous by Thread:	winmail.dat (was Re: Sig length scoring), Vincent Lefevre
Next by Thread:	Re: Sig length scoring (was Re: subscribe), David W. Tamkin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]