Re: spam sw pattern.

procmail

Re: spam sw pattern.

1997-06-02 07:17:00

 > X-UIDL: 6478789540b74jdi9a321loi771l8f8k 

I don't know about this; I believe you can filter on X-UIDL if you're
not a POP user yourself (but you should apparently not use this as the
sole criterion for a spam reject).


Yep.  

* ^X-uidl:.* should work just fine.  I've caught a couple 
using that.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: spam sw pattern., Jeff Knapp Re: spam sw pattern., era eriksson Re: spam sw pattern., Ralph Sims <= Re: spam sw pattern., Wotan Re: spam sw pattern., Jeff Knapp Spam regulation, Simeon ben Nevel Re: spam sw pattern., William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm} Re: spam sw pattern., Michael Cooley

Previous by Date:	Re: spam sw pattern., William J. Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm}
Next by Date:	Where in blazes did this come from?, Matthew G. Saroff
Previous by Thread:	Re: spam sw pattern., era eriksson
Next by Thread:	Re: spam sw pattern., Wotan
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]