On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, R Lindberg / E Winnie wrote:
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 11:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: R Lindberg / E Winnie <rlindber(_at_)kendaco(_dot_)telebyte(_dot_)com>
Actually trapping all X-UIDL headers can trap real messages, there is a
better filter for the X-UIDL that traps only bogusly formed ones that has
been posted here several times in the last few days
Does anybody have an explanation as to *why* they stick X-UIDL headers
in? And why haven't they stopped now that they've read this?
--
g-r-a-t-e-f-u-l-l-y---[ email:<fishbowl(_at_)conservatory(_dot_)com>
]---l-i-v-i-n-g
d-e-a-d-i-c-a-t-e-d---[ http://www.conservatory.com/ ]-----l-i-g-h-t
You should never bet against anything in science at odds of more than
about 10^12 to 1. -- Ernest Rutherford