procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Abuse of procmail list

1997-09-25 07:41:32
        Author:        Ken Hooper <bighouse(_at_)type2(_dot_)com>
        Original-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:30:37 -0600
        Message-ID:    
<l03102821b0503133af90(_at_)[207(_dot_)53(_dot_)22(_dot_)223]>

They are the likliest people in the universe to be able to figure a
complicated procmail script out. That is the whole point. Does everybody
here understand how all the bits of SpamBouncer go together? There are a
whole lot of recipes posted here that I don't understand, but that doesn't
make them off-topic.

You are clearly missing one important point here:

There is no mailing list set up for SpamBouncer (at least that I am aware of).

If there were, then it would be correct to post them there, rather than here.

It goes back to my illustration about comp.unix.* groups.  Just because you  
can make an argument for more than one group does not mean that you should  
post to more than one group.

SmartList is a *specific* group of procmail recipes, put together for a  
specific reason, with a specific list to deal with questions.  If Alan  
started his own list for people who don't understand his procmail library,  
and I kept posting here about it, I would expect folks to say ``Why aren't  
you going to Alan's list with this?''

Unless the smartlist list is cancelled by the admin, that is the place where  
questions should go.

TjL


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>