++ 31/10/99 14:43 -0600 - David W. Tamkin:
Here's an equivalent:
[...]
Oke, i changed to that second version. It works perfect, but i would
like to see one thing change.
This is what i have in the logs when no dups are found:
procmail: Locking "msgid.lock"
procmail: Executing "formail,-D,8192,/home/rejo/.log/msgid.cache"
procmail: Program failure (1) of "formail"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=formail -D 8192 /home/rejo/.log/msgid.cache"
procmail: Unlocking "msgid.lock"
When a dup if found:
procmail: Locking "msgid.lock"
procmail: [1637] Tue Nov 2 09:02:17 1999
procmail: Executing "formail,-D,8192,/home/rejo/.log/msgid.cache"
procmail: [1637] Tue Nov 2 09:02:17 1999
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=formail -D 8192 /home/rejo/.log/msgid.cache"
procmail: Unlocking "msgid.lock"
procmail: Assigning "nl"
procmail: Assigning "nl="
procmail: Assigning "notice=X-Note: Message-ID seen before recently."
Can i get rid of this 'Program failure' in the first case? I know it is
completely correct, but i'm sure i will get confused because of it one
day or another... like when grepping logs on 'failure' or 'error'. Can't
there be a more descriptive or rephrased line there?
-Rejo.
--
= Rejo Zenger [Sister Ray Crisiscentrum]
rejo(_at_)sisterray(_dot_)xs4all(_dot_)nl
= http://mediaport.org/~sister PGP: see headers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------