On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, John Patton wrote:
Send us the recipes for this... its kind-of hard to know
whats going on without it. Meanwhile you could try using the
^TO_ pattern for matching, if you arn't already. Otherwise,
starting your pattern with ^to:.* will only match the To:
fields and nothing else.
This is what I had:
:0
* ^TO.( |<)*matthew(_at_)manuel(_dot_)ca
{
:0
! manuel(_at_)cs(_dot_)dal(_dot_)ca
}
I just changed it form TO to TO_, although I don't think that will make a
difference in my case. What subtle difference can this change make?
Could email addresses with numerics stop the original recipe from
working??? How about the <triangle brackets> in the addresses listed
before mine in the header?
My address was written correctly in the email which should have been
bounced, it was just burried deep in the header.
Thanks!
-Matthew
--
| _ ___ Matthew Manuel
Matthew(_at_)Manuel(_dot_)ca
_ (=) |:|____--| Halifax, Nova Scotia www.Manuel.ca
|.| | |:|==| |-| via Mississauga, Ontario ICQ# 13963820
|.| | ____|:|==| |-|
|.| | ////\\:|==| |-| "Forever never seems that long until your grown"
|.| ^| ||==| |-| - Andre 3000 of Outkast, "Ms. Jackson"
<EOT>
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail