On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, zenn wrote:
:0fw
| spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
!coughtspam
I'm probably missing some obvious reason why this is a good idea, but
should you be using a local lock file on that second recipe (:0:, instead
of :0)?
Luke
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail