I object to the use of blacklists I don't personally control. (I
understand Spamassassin also uses rules, etc.; but the use of blacklists
turns me off. I've been told the blacklists can be turned off; but the we
have procmail running inside of procmail (sorta)) :)
Thanks for the suggestion.
- fleet -
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Stephen Patterson wrote:
On 15 Feb 03, fleet(_at_)teachout(_dot_)org (fleet(_at_)teachout(_dot_)org)
wrote:
This probably wouldn't work for me. I administer several web sites for
the local sportfishing captains. Most contain a statement to the effect
that if the client took any pictures, they can e-mail them to me and I
will post them on the appropriate website. I can get e-mail from an
individual I never heard of before (with, occasionally, a huge
attachment), and once I answer him/her with the report that the images
have been posted, I might never hear from him/her again. Most of these
messages wouldn't be BCC'd, of course, but in a very short time, I'd have
a very large white list with a large percent of the addresses never to be
used again.
Have you considered using spamassassin? I get spammed most days and
spamassassin handles it just fine (with a serious shedload of
filtering expressions) so I hardly ever see spam in my regular inbox.
In .procmailrc, (and ${SPAM} is defined)
:0fw
| spamassassin
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
${SPAM}
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail