On Saturday, May 24, 2003, at 11:46 Canada/Mountain, Professional
Software Engineering wrote:
# 20030501/0809 SBS
# Hokey HTML commenting
#
:0
* < 25000
* -10^0
* 1^1 B ?? (<!--)
{
SPAMVAL="+175"
SPAMMISHNESS="${SPAMMISHNESS}${SPAMVAL}"
SPAMNOTES="${SPAMNOTES}SPAM: ${SPAMVAL} Advisory - abundance of HTML
comments${NL}"
}
Though I'm not on many lists doing HTML (and I despise HTML emails in
general, though included HTML _code_ is a different matter), the above
rule certainly hasn't yet hammered anything it shouldn't have.
Why not test for Content-type? if the message isn't html then the
comments are a lot less likely to be spammish, right?
--
Don't congratulate yourself too much, or berate yourself either. Your
choices are half chance; so are everybody else's.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail