On Tuesday 28 Aug 2007, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Anne Wilson <cannewilson(_at_)googlemail(_dot_)com> [08-28-07 14:09]:
I never set a return address, largely because it causes problems on
some mailing lists.
I don't understand this statement. I always set the "From:" address.
Perhaps I should not have said "return".
Apologies, then. I thought you were implying the Reply-To field, which was
why I didn't understand you.
I don't use googlemail's smtp, so I'm not certain what you are saying.
I see that you don't. From the header of your post:
Received: from [192.168.0.70] (unknown [192.168.0.70])
by david.lydgate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701B8C9192 for
<procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de>; Tue, 28 Aug 2007
19:06:53 +0100 (BST)
Your message shows your gmail address, so as far as I can see, that's
just the way I'm using it.
there was no comment about *your* usage. Mr. Livingston commented:
<quote>
I won't ever use gmail for a list subscription for this reason. I *WANT*
the copy with the list headers added. And I don't want to jump through
extra hoops to make a copy of my sent messages in my list folders even
if he headers weren't important.
</quote>
the comment you have responded was about the above quote. :^)
You're right - sorry I did reply to the wrong message.
I have explained to the list several times that googlemail was in no way
implicated in the problem I had, and that it appears to act satisfactorily
for me, yet there has been continued accusations of sub-standard behaviour.
I can't help but feel that, without a direct link to the question, this
discussion is out of place.
Sorry it seemed aimed at you.
Anne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail