Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:40:40 -0500From:
antennex(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)comSubject: RE: Using procmail on mail relayTo:
lindsey(_at_)ncsa(_dot_)uiuc(_dot_)edu; orvilleg(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)comCC:
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:49:39 -0500> From:
lindsey(_at_)ncsa(_dot_)uiuc(_dot_)edu> Subject: Re: Using procmail on mail
relay> To: orvilleg(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> CC:
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE> > > 1) MX1 = first relay used
to filter via rbls only, then rest relayed> > to MX2> > > > 2) MX2 = 2nd
relay used with spamassassin and ClamAV for more> > filtering,> > then rest
to the various domains hosted on different servers> > -- no local users on
MX2> > > > I'm trying to eliminate the backscatter or blowback to MX1 from
MX2> > for rejected emails.> > > > These MXes are handling about 100k emails
daily.> > Hi Jack,>
To improve the recipe on my earlier post, this seems to work to catch scores of
1x.x up to the 3x.x score (like 10.6 and 30.2 as examples).
What think ye folks?
## Redirect spams :0:* ^X-Spam-Status:(.*\<)?Yes
* $(score=10[1-9]\.*[0-9]|20[1-9]\.*[0-9]|30[1-9]\.*[0-9])$REVIEW
Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks & Treats for You! Get 'em!
_________________________________________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble
challenge with star power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_oct
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail