At 09:01 2009-02-09 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
THIS recipe, however, is invalid.
* ^From:(_dot_)root(_at_)rudun-nbmaster001(_dot_)cc1(_dot_)rush(_dot_)edu
* ^Subject:.L700 NetBackup
/opt/home/cbarnard/backups
And why is this appearing twice anyway, is it no the exact same as the
lines above?
Not EXACT - the a hostname differs. The following rule would combine them:
:0:
* ^From:[ ]*root(_at_)rudun-nbmaster00(1|2)\.cc1\.rush\.edu
* ^Subject:[ ]*L700 NetBackup
/opt/home/cbarnard/backups
The difference in hostnammes is handled by the regexp parentheticals. Dots
are properly escaped, and the leading spaces between header and content are
replaced with a space-tab character class instead of a single-character
wildcard.
The OPs problem of course is that the second copy of the rule was missing
the :0: at the beginning, which makes it an invalid rule, thus all the
recipe hopscotch.
You do not need a lock on a /dev/null delivery.
Agreed.
---
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Procmail disclaimer: <http://www.professional.org/procmail/disclaimer.html>
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
____________________________________________________________
procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail