Procmail (date)
February 28, 2009
- Re: Out of Memory, LuKreme, 19:17
- Maildir and "Date Received", LuKreme, 16:08
- Re: Can *^From.*(foo(_at_)bar) be confused?, Dallman Ross, 08:20
- Re: Out of Memory, Dallman Ross, 08:09
- Can *^From.*(foo(_at_)bar) be confused?, Antony McLellan, 02:19
- Out of Memory, LuKreme, 00:02
February 25, 2009
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, Patrick Shanahan, 15:57
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, LuKreme, 15:40
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, LuKreme, 15:37
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, Dallman Ross, 15:32
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, Dallman Ross, 15:31
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, LuKreme, 15:30
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, LuKreme, 15:10
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, LuKreme, 15:03
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, Dallman Ross, 12:10
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:20
- Re: Moving from mbox to Maildir, Patrick Shanahan, 08:04
- Re: Passing mail delivery onto /usr/bin/deliverquota with arguments defined by procmail, Marcus Sykes, 07:08
- Moving from mbox to Maildir, LuKreme, 01:39
February 19, 2009
- Re: IP regex, Professional Software Engineering, 23:45
- Re: Subscribed?, Michelle Konzack, 23:10
- Re: IP regex, Fleet Teachout, 22:37
- Re: IP regex, LuKreme, 22:24
- Re: IP regex, Fleet Teachout, 21:57
- Re: IP regex, Professional Software Engineering, 21:46
- IP regex, Fleet Teachout, 21:32
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Professional Software Engineering, 19:28
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:06
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, o . nash, 16:03
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Charles Gregory, 13:02
- Re: [pro] Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Charles Gregory, 12:57
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Professional Software Engineering, 12:14
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Holger Wahlen, 12:10
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Professional Software Engineering, 12:04
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, o . nash, 11:56
- Re: procmail regex style using Or construct, Charles Gregory, 11:38
- procmail regex style using Or construct, o . nash, 10:04
- Re: Syslog, LuKreme, 10:02
- Subscribed?, LuKreme, 09:55
February 12, 2009
- Syslog, Adrian Overbury, 21:39
- RE: Add X-Envelope From/To into incoming mail, Dallman Ross, 09:59
- Re: Add X-Envelope From/To into incoming mail, Petr Hudeček, 09:54
- Re: Add X-Envelope From/To into incoming mail, Petr Hudeček, 09:24
- Re: Add X-Envelope From/To into incoming mail, Petr Hudeček, 08:30
- Re: Add X-Envelope From/To into incoming mail, Petr Hudeček, 08:19
- Re: Add X-Envelope From/To into incoming mail, Petr Hudeček, 08:18
- Add X-Envelope From/To into incoming mail, Petr Hudeček, 05:30
February 10, 2009
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, Rem P Roberti, 23:49
- RE: Playing a .wav sound, Dallman Ross, 20:57
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, LuKreme, 20:16
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, LuKreme, 20:12
- RE: Playing a .wav sound, Fleet Teachout, 20:10
- RE: Playing a .wav sound, Dallman Ross, 19:50
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, Alan Clifford, 19:13
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, Rem P Roberti, 19:01
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, Alan Clifford, 18:48
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, Rem P Roberti, 18:28
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, Rem P Roberti, 18:21
- RE: Playing a .wav sound, Dallman Ross, 18:16
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, Alan Clifford, 18:08
- Re: Playing a .wav sound, LuKreme, 17:55
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, LuKreme, 17:40
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, LuKreme, 17:37
- Playing a .wav sound, Rem P Roberti, 17:01
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Professional Software Engineering, 16:46
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Christopher L. Barnard, 15:45
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Dallman Ross, 15:33
- RE: Rule not being honored. Why?, Christopher L. Barnard, 15:12
- RE: Rule not being honored. Why?, Professional Software Engineering, 14:17
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Dallman Ross, 14:00
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Holger Wahlen, 13:50
- RE: Rule not being honored. Why?, Christopher L. Barnard, 13:35
- Re: Receiving System Mail, Curtis Maurand, 13:14
- RE: Rule not being honored. Why?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:10
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Dallman Ross, 10:53
- RE: Rule not being honored. Why?, Christopher L. Barnard, 10:36
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, LuKreme, 10:35
February 09, 2009
- RE: Rule not being honored. Why?, Dallman Ross, 14:02
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:38
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Christopher L. Barnard, 11:56
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Richard Ball, 11:02
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, LuKreme, 11:01
- Re: Rule not being honored. Why?, Johannes Grimm, 10:31
- Rule not being honored. Why?, Christopher L. Barnard, 10:14
February 04, 2009
- Re: recipe problem, Charles Gregory, 15:55
- Re: recipe problem, LuKreme, 14:58
- Re: recipe problem, Praedor Atrebates, 14:37
- Re: recipe problem, LuKreme, 14:21
- Creating a backup in procmailrc, LuKreme, 14:19
- Re: Receiving System Mail, Rem P Roberti, 12:24
- recipe problem, Praedor Atrebates, 12:06
- Re: Receiving System Mail, Patrick Shanahan, 11:54
- Re: Receiving System Mail, Rem P Roberti, 11:44
- Re: Receiving System Mail, emailjp79, 06:39
February 01, 2009
- Re: Receiving System Mail, Michelle Konzack, 12:15
- RE: Wrong syntax?, Dallman Ross, 12:03
- Re: Wrong syntax?, Rem P Roberti, 11:56
- Re: Wrong syntax?, Charles Gregory, 08:25
- Re: Wrong syntax?, Richard Ball, 07:59
- Re: [pro] RE: Wrong syntax?, Charles Gregory, 07:52
- RE: Wrong syntax?, Dallman Ross, 07:08
- Wrong syntax?, Rem P Roberti, 00:47