spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: lookups by macro expansion

2003-10-27 21:50:26
Aredridel <aredridel(_at_)nbtsc(_dot_)org>:
My take is that you ought to remove the subsumed mechanisms -- since 
developers have to implement the macro one, it will save them work not 
having to implement the rest.. The eliminated mechanisms are:

I rather agree: one way to do it.

For what it's worth, despite not liking macro expansions generally, the
power and simplicity really sway me.  I liked SPV draft 1 for its
simplicity; this rings similarly to me.

Likewise.  A lot of the standard reasons for not doing macroexpansion
go away when (as in this case) expressions don't have side effects.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com

Attachment: pgp2sFp949gCR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>