Ability not policy [was: Maybe simple question]

> From: Greg Connor [mailto:gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org] 
...
> I strongly believe that multiple solutions are required to stop spam.  I 
> strongly disagree with anyone who says "There is one right answer to the 
> spam problem and it is X".  (I'm not sure if this is what you meant to say
> or not...)
One of the reasons for XWindows success (in UNIX variants, at least), was
the notion of "ability not policy".  SPF encourages domain holders (the
payees) to choose a policy.  But it doesn't seem to enforce any one.  This
is a good thing.

---
http://www.pnambic.com/leeca
... The real cycle you're working on is a cycle called 'yourself'. 

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com