On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 12:38 -0800, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
The actual 550 5.1.1 error did include the SRS0 address I just
simply did not include it for berevity.
Too brief :)
Actually at this time I have no CBV in place on my servers. In
this instance it came as a result of me trying to post to a
SourceForge.net mailing list and their CBV tried to verify the
return-path which was SRS signed address.
They're using Exim, so I know their CBV isn't broken; it's using empty
reverse-path. It is, however, possible that they've managed to set it up
to mangle the case of the localpart in the callback. Can you
double-check the address they attempted to call back to, and check that
your local setup normal does accept mail to SRS0 addresses?
Show full log of a transaction which works, and of one which doesn't.
--
dwmw2