spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SRS and RCPT TO: question

2004-03-13 12:13:45
<list+spf-discuss(_at_)doeblitz(_dot_)net> [2004-03-13/17:55]:
--On Freitag, März 12, 2004 13:03:46 -0800 Greg Connor 
<gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org> wrote:
[...]
Perhaps it's a good idea to accept mail to SRS addresses claiming to be
from postmaster@ ...  In addition to CBV reasons, I have found a small
number of normal bounces that use MAIL FROM: postmaster(_at_)* or MAIL FROM:
mailer-daemon(_at_)* instead of mail-from: <>

<MAILER-DAEMON(_at_)sitename> is very common for UUCP-setups as UUCP does not 
allow empty envelope senders.

Then those systems forwarding bounces from such UUCP setups to the open
Internet seem to violate a largish number of RFC, for example RFC 2821,
section 6, unless they rewrite bounces' return paths to <> before
forwarding them. I don't think working around brokenness like that is
necessarily a good thing.

But anyway, wrong list?

Cheers,
Dan


-- 
Daniel Roethlisberger <daniel(_at_)roe(_dot_)ch>
GnuPG key ID 0x804A06B1 (DSA/ElGamal)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>