Alternatively, are there any whitelists? Something that I could use to
generate positive returns rather than negative....
Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Marc
Alaia
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:42 PM
To: 'spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com'
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] SPF Guess
Meng wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:10:36PM -0500, Marc Alaia wrote:
| Guys,
|
| I am having a problem with the guess feature of MSQ. MSQ is being called
by
| a perl script and the log from the script is:
|
"guess" was designd to produce passes; it was not designed to produce
fails.
Would it be difficult to make it work for fails, too? Based on log
analysis, it would have a hit rate of nearly 80%!
the "local" argument may work better for what you want to do. can you
try that instead? leave out the "all" directive when you do.
I don't understand what you mean. Can you direct me to a page for syntax?
I can't find anything on 'local' on the Mechanisms or Macros pages....
Thanks,
Marc
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/spf-draft-200403.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com