-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, wayne spewed into the bitstream:
w>In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)58(_dot_)0403301439480(_dot_)8767(_at_)stealth(_dot_)moongroup(_dot_)org>
csm(_at_)Lunar-Linux(_dot_)org writes:
w>
w>> > [explanation snipped]
w>> An altogether excellent explanation on the "all" issue.
w>
w>Agreed.
w>
w>
w>> Any thoughts as to why AOL is not showing any SPF records?
w>
w>AOL *is* showing SPF records, it is just that they use ?all instead of
w>-all. I think that SPF is just too new for them to commit to using
w>~all or -all.
Okees... since I know someone who works in their NOC in Manassas I will
reach out to them and see what's the haps! :-)
- --
csm
Lunar Linux Project Lead
Disclaimer: "I am not a curmudgeon! No... really..."
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAad5mq3bny/5+GAcRApp5AJ9haqRPxAC1lQ30x7FaAyIh1MsU/gCfSr6F
oOlEa6G1y2LKQXWYEb9E7BQ=
=zAo0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----