spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ?all

2004-03-30 13:53:55
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, wayne spewed into the bitstream:

w>In 
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)58(_dot_)0403301439480(_dot_)8767(_at_)stealth(_dot_)moongroup(_dot_)org>
 csm(_at_)Lunar-Linux(_dot_)org writes:
w>
w>> > [explanation snipped]
w>> An altogether excellent explanation on the "all" issue.
w>
w>Agreed.
w>
w>
w>> Any thoughts as to why AOL is not showing any SPF records?
w>
w>AOL *is* showing SPF records, it is just that they use ?all instead of
w>-all.  I think that SPF is just too new for them to commit to using
w>~all or -all.

Okees... since I know someone who works in their NOC in Manassas I will 
reach out to them and see what's the haps! :-)

- -- 
csm
Lunar Linux Project Lead
Disclaimer: "I am not a curmudgeon! No... really..."
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAad5mq3bny/5+GAcRApp5AJ9haqRPxAC1lQ30x7FaAyIh1MsU/gCfSr6F
oOlEa6G1y2LKQXWYEb9E7BQ=
=zAo0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>