Greg Hewgill wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:31:34PM +0200, Ernesto Baschny wrote:
reverse (just one possible):
This is a bit off topic, but I've seen multiple PTR records for one ip address,
for example 64.251.192.200 has 245 different PTR records. I can't help but
think this is violating some established practice somewhere.
It is... While it's not necessarily against the RFC AFAIK, the Cricket
book (4th edition) says use ONE PTR record and it should point at the
canonical name only.