SPF Discuss (date)
April 27, 2004
- Re: Qmail Virtual Hosts, spf, 11:17
- Re: ANNOUNCE sendmail-milter-spf version 1.41, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 10:54
- Qmail Virtual Hosts, Aditya Ivaturi, 08:23
- Re: Internet-Draft 01 Release Candidate 1: slight macro changes., Meng Weng Wong, 08:10
- Re: Internet-Draft 01 Release Candidate 1: slight macro changes., Tony Finch, 08:05
- Internet-Draft 01 Release Candidate 1: slight macro changes., Meng Weng Wong, 07:51
- ANNOUNCE: rmxf for Postfix 2, Różański Sergiusz, 03:23
April 26, 2004
- ANNOUNCE sendmail-milter-spf version 1.41, Mark, 22:43
- Re: solving the demon problem: use the zonecut, Greg Connor, 21:30
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 15:59
- Re: solving the demon problem: use the zonecut, spf, 15:13
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, spf, 14:56
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, csm, 14:11
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Spf Pobox, 12:56
- RE: greeting cards websites, Seth Goodman, 12:01
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Daniel Taylor, 10:28
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Daniel Taylor, 10:19
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, wayne, 09:19
- greeting cards websites, Meng Weng Wong, 08:55
- RE: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Andy Bakun, 08:34
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:30
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Alain Knaff, 07:23
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Daniel Taylor, 06:38
- Re: SV: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, David Brodbeck, 06:29
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Paul Howarth, 06:21
- Re: solving the demon problem: use the zonecut, wayne, 06:16
- RE: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Seth Goodman, 06:14
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, wayne, 06:07
- Re: Mail::SPF::Query 1.997 released, wayne, 05:48
- Mail::SPF::Query 1.997 released, Roger Moser, 02:10
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Andy Bakun, 01:06
April 25, 2004
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Meng Weng Wong, 23:36
- spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Roger Moser, 23:29
- Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 04/26/04, Wayne Schlitt, 23:26
- Mail::SPF::Query 1.997 released, Meng Weng Wong, 23:19
- specification 200404.txt introduces "accredit" modifier, Meng Weng Wong, 13:41
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, wayne, 07:13
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Graham Murray, 07:12
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, David Woodhouse, 06:07
- SPF test system version 2.1 now available, wayne, 05:20
- SV: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Lars Dybdahl, 04:34
April 24, 2004
- I RTFM but still have a simple ?, PARIS , 17:21
- Re: I'm trying to reach postmaster(_at_)alumniconnections(_dot_)com, Meng Weng Wong, 14:16
- Re: I'm trying to reach postmaster(_at_)acm(_dot_)org(_dot_), Lou Katz, 12:48
- I'm trying to reach postmaster(_at_)acm(_dot_)org(_dot_), Meng Weng Wong, 12:12
- RE: Sender forwarding, Dustin D. Trammell, 11:33
- Re: IRC channel announced, vague strategy plan, organizational issues, Dustin D. Trammell, 11:31
- IRC channel announced, vague strategy plan, organizational issues, Meng Weng Wong, 11:02
April 23, 2004
- SPF effectiveness, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:01
- RE: on the validity of the "looks like broadband" rule, list+spf-discuss, 14:12
- RE: Hosting anyone?, Steven Foster, 09:22
- Re: SPF and HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:16
- Re: SPF and HELO, Nigel Metheringham, 01:29
April 22, 2004
- SV: Hosting anyone?, Lars Dybdahl, 23:30
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 17:25
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 17:10
- Hosting anyone?, fotis, 17:01
- Re: SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker, 15:46
- SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 14:57
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker, 14:46
- Re: Sender forwarding, spf, 14:34
- RE: Sender forwarding, SPF_0x1b, 12:57
- RE: Whitelists instead of SRS, Seth Goodman, 12:51
- Re: SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Alain Knaff, 09:10
- Re: Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombiespam, Meng Weng Wong, 09:02
- RE: SPF and HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:58
- INBOX Email Event, June 2 evening -- SPF Community Offer, Meng Weng Wong, 08:47
- RE: SPF and HELO, Philip Tucker, 08:37
- SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 08:30
- Re: SPF and HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:12
- Re: SPF and HELO, wayne, 07:39
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch, 07:01
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor, 06:44
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch, 06:36
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Alain Knaff, 06:28
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor, 06:23
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch, 06:02
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Theo Schlossnagle, 05:41
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 05:39
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombiespam, Lloyd Zusman, 04:17
- Re: Sender forwarding, spf, 01:30
- RE: on the validity of the "looks like broadband" rule, Stefan Engelbert, 01:00
- SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 00:38
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker, 00:34
- SV: on the validity of the "looks like broadband" rule, Lars Dybdahl, 00:30
April 21, 2004
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Theo Schlossnagle, 21:52
- Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker, 21:44
- media: PC magazine, 20 april, Meng Weng Wong, 21:29
- Re: Sender forwarding, Meng Weng Wong, 21:06
- Re: Sender forwarding, Theo Schlossnagle, 19:50
- Re: Sender forwarding, David Woodhouse, 19:38
- Re: Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombiespam, Mark, 18:11
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Lloyd Zusman, 17:38
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Theo Van Dinter, 17:07
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 16:33
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Mark, 16:29
- Re: Sender forwarding, marc, 16:18
- Re: Sender forwarding, Alan Hodgson, 16:14
- Sender forwarding, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:52
- Re: Digest 1.254 for spf-discuss, administrator, 14:59
- RE: SRS question, Seth Goodman, 14:52
- Re: on the validity of the "looks like broadband" rule, George Schlossnagle, 14:44
- on the validity of the "looks like broadband" rule, Meng Weng Wong, 14:39
- Re: Digest 1.254 for spf-discuss, George Mitchell, 14:38
- Re: Digest 1.254 for spf-discuss, administrator, 14:32
- Re: SRS question, Daniel Taylor, 13:03
- Re: SRS question, Meng Weng Wong, 12:58
- Re: SRS question, Daniel Taylor, 12:54
- Re: SRS question, Paul Howarth, 12:33
- Re: SRS question, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:27
- SRS question, Daniel Taylor, 12:17
- new slides online: ISPCON; and "crossing the beams", Meng Weng Wong, 11:38
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Meng Weng Wong, 11:29
- RE: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security conc ern?, Daryl Odnert, 10:02
- RE: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security conc ern?, Daryl Odnert, 09:53
- SPF and HELO, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:51
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Theo Schlossnagle, 05:16
- Re: Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, spf, 05:14
- Re: persistent spfd connection failures, Paul Howarth, 02:02
April 20, 2004
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 22:41
- RE: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Seth Goodman, 21:51
- related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Meng Weng Wong, 21:20
- SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars Dybdahl, 16:16
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, John A. Martin, 12:53
- Re: Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, wayne, 11:45
- Re: persistent spfd connection failures, Joe Christy, 11:23
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, John A. Martin, 11:06
- Re: Digest 1.253 for spf-discuss, administrator, 09:38
- Re: Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, wayne, 09:24
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 09:12
- Re: Digest 1.253 for spf-discuss, administrator, 08:59
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, John A. Martin, 08:32
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, wayne, 07:19
- SV: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, Lars Dybdahl, 07:12
- 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, John A. Martin, 06:15
- Re: Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers, Spf Pobox, 05:02
- Re: Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers, Paul Howarth, 04:42
- SV: Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers, Lars Dybdahl, 04:38
- Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers, Spf Pobox, 04:19
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Tony Finch, 01:32
- SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars Dybdahl, 00:54
April 19, 2004
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Graham Murray, 23:03
- Re: persistent spfd connection failures, Meng Weng Wong, 20:33
- Re: persistent spfd connection failures, wayne, 16:31
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 13:49
- persistent spfd connection failures, Joe Christy, 13:09
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 12:43
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, David Brodbeck, 12:29
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Cary Fitch, 12:28
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 12:20
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars B. Dybdahl, 11:53
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:40
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 11:34
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Seth Goodman, 11:11
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 10:28
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David Brodbeck, 09:06
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:00
- XMail Feedback requested, administrator, 07:43
- Re: joker.com?, Ian Castle, 04:33
- Re: SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 03:18
- Re: SES vs. SPF, was Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Tony Finch, 03:07
- SV: SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars Dybdahl, 03:00
- Re: SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Tony Finch, 02:53
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Tony Finch, 02:49
- SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars Dybdahl, 02:05
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 01:24
- Re: ORCPT as an alternative to SRS., Mark Shewmaker, 00:38
April 18, 2004
- Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 04/19/04, Wayne Schlitt, 23:23
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Greg Connor, 23:06
- Re: ORCPT as an alternative to SRS., wayne, 21:23
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 15:30
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars B. Dybdahl, 15:15
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 15:05
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 14:50
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 14:33
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 11:35
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 10:22
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Theo Schlossnagle, 08:30
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Theo Schlossnagle, 08:19
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:29
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:22
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 04:57
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Hector Santos, 03:02
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Hector Santos, 02:42
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, K.F.J. Martens, 01:46
- ORCPT as an alternative to SRS., Mark Shewmaker, 00:30
April 17, 2004
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 22:30
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, George Mitchell, 21:51
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 21:30
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 18:51
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 18:44
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 12:44
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Seth Goodman, 12:11
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 11:55
- joker.com?, Zack Brown, 07:41
April 16, 2004
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, James Couzens, 19:30
- Creating SPF TXT records on Enom, Denny Fox, 19:17
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Meng Weng Wong, 15:49
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 14:05
- Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Dustin D. Trammell, 13:55
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, wayne, 13:13
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 12:46
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 12:43
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, wayne, 12:38
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Wechsler, 12:25
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 11:52
- Novell GroupWise, Kristi L CASTLE, 11:15
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, David Woodhouse, 10:46
- Re: Re: list of who's checking SPF, Kelson Vibber, 10:39
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, John A. Martin, 10:29
- list of who's checking SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 09:51
- Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS concern, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:01
- Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS concern, Shevek, 04:23
April 15, 2004
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, VoidLogic, 16:03
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Dustin D. Trammell, 15:31
- Re: SV: Blacklists, Dustin D. Trammell, 15:28
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 09:55
- Re: SRS concern, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:43
- Re: Counter proposal [Re: Publishing of SPF Records], George Mitchell, 09:38
- Re: testing spf setup, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 09:22
- RE: Blacklists, Lyndon Eaton, 09:21
- Re: some statistics, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 09:18
- RE: Blacklists, Lyndon Eaton, 08:58
- RE: Blacklists, Jasper Wallace, 08:48
- RE: Blacklists, Lyndon Eaton, 08:24
- Re: Counter proposal [Re: Publishing of SPF Records], Daniel Taylor, 08:23
- Re: Counter proposal [Re: Publishing of SPF Records], Wechsler, 08:21
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, K.F.J. Martens, 08:20
- Re: Counter proposal [Re: Publishing of SPF Records], wayne, 08:15
- Re: Blacklists, Jasper Wallace, 08:12
- Counter proposal [Re: Publishing of SPF Records], Daniel Taylor, 08:05
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Daniel Taylor, 07:50
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Wechsler, 07:49
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, wayne, 07:49
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Fridrik Skulason, 07:36
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 07:28
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, wayne, 07:16
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Daniel Taylor, 07:15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 07:00
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, K.F.J. Martens, 06:57
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 06:56
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 06:53
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Wechsler, 06:51
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Daniel Taylor, 06:48
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 06:35
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, K.F.J. Martens, 06:28
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 06:24
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 06:10
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 05:59
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars B. Dybdahl, 05:37
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 05:25
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, wayne, 05:19
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 05:19
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 05:13
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 05:11
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 05:08
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 05:06
- Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 04:56
- Re: SV: Blacklists, David Woodhouse, 04:56
- Brute-forcing the domain space, and other updates, Wechsler, 03:59
- Re: Blacklists, Greg Hewgill, 00:35
April 14, 2004
- SV: Blacklists, Lars Dybdahl, 23:51
- Re: Blacklists, Bill Landry, 23:33
- Re: testing spf setup, Paul Howarth, 23:26
- Re: Blacklists, Paul Howarth, 23:20
- Blacklists, Lars Dybdahl, 22:30
- Re: some statistics, wayne, 19:10
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Vivien M., 18:18
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 17:56
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Aredridel, 17:06
- Re: some statistics, Meng Weng Wong, 16:04
- Re: some statistics, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 15:51
- Re: testing spf setup, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 15:46
- Re: SRS concern, Ben Greear, 14:15
- Re: SRS concern, K.F.J. Martens, 14:09
- Re: SRS concern, Joe Rhett, 12:55
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 12:40
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 12:33
- Re: testing spf setup, Paul Howarth, 12:26
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 12:14
- Re: testing spf setup, Ben Greear, 11:50
- Re: testing spf setup, wayne, 11:40
- Re: testing spf setup, Ben Greear, 11:36
- Re: testing spf setup, wayne, 11:28
- Re: SRS concern, wayne, 11:15
- Re: SRS concern, wayne, 11:06
- testing spf setup, Ben Greear, 11:03
- Re: some statistics, Alan Hodgson, 10:04
- Re: what is the use of a newborn baby?, csm, 10:02
- Re: some statistics, Nigel Metheringham, 09:27
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Paul Howarth, 09:26
- Re: some statistics, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 09:19
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 09:09
- New heavy with an SPF record, frank, 09:06
- what is the use of a newborn baby?, Meng Weng Wong, 08:45
- Re: some statistics, Theo Schlossnagle, 07:04
- some statistics, Roger Moser, 06:18
- Re: Fw: Sender verification, K.F.J. Martens, 05:39
- Fw: Sender verification, Mark, 05:15
- SV: SRS concern, Lars Dybdahl, 01:49
- Re: SPF validation, wayne, 00:41
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Paul Howarth, 00:27
- SPF validation, Roger Moser, 00:05
April 13, 2004
- Re: SRS concern, Joe Rhett, 22:00
- Re: SRS concern, John A. Martin, 21:24
- SPF validation, Dean Gibson (Mail Administrator), 21:00
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 19:23
- Re: SRS concern, Neil Brown, 18:57
- RE: SRS concern, Eric Girard, 14:30
- Re: SRS concern, John Capo, 14:30
- Re: SRS concern, K.F.J. Martens, 14:01
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 13:48
- Re: SRS concern, spf, 13:45
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Meng Weng Wong, 13:37
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 13:17
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 13:17
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 13:12
- Re: SRS concern, spf, 13:06
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Vivien M., 13:02
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 12:56
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 12:52
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 12:31
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Tim Meadowcroft, 12:28
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Vivien M., 12:23
- Re: SRS concern, David Woodhouse, 12:22
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 12:09
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 12:05
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 11:59
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 11:56
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 11:48
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Ernesto Baschny, 11:28
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Alan Hodgson, 11:19
- Re: proposed adoption and rollout schedule, Joe Rhett, 11:16
- SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 11:14
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 11:12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 11:10
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 11:07
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Daniel Taylor, 11:04
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 11:00
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David Woodhouse, 10:37
- Re: proposed adoption and rollout schedule, David Woodhouse, 10:33
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Dustin D. Trammell, 09:28
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Daniel Taylor, 06:12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 05:51
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 05:41
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 05:36
April 12, 2004
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Greg Connor, 21:06
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 18:36
- Re: Case-sensitive?, wayne, 18:29
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Greg Wooledge, 18:19
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Dustin D. Trammell, 16:04
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Roy Badami, 15:34
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Roy Badami, 15:29
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Meng Weng Wong, 14:03
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Dustin D. Trammell, 13:34
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Lars B. Dybdahl, 12:54
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 12:45
- Re: Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 12:41
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Dustin D. Trammell, 12:36
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Dustin D. Trammell, 12:28
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Jim Ramsay, 12:11
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 11:35
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 11:26
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Roy Badami, 08:48
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Roy Badami, 08:34
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 08:07
- Announce: spf-event-sink 0.6, spf-team, 01:03
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Lars B. Dybdahl, 00:41
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David Woodhouse, 00:15
April 11, 2004
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 23:53
- Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 04/12/04, Wayne Schlitt, 23:23
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Nick Phillips, 16:39
- Case-sensitive?, Roger Moser, 15:12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Meng Weng Wong, 10:22
- first spf-enabled spam, David, 04:07
- Re: Re: How to get listed at trusted-forwarder.org ?, David Woodhouse, 02:22
April 09, 2004
- [spf-devel] ANNOUNCE libspf-alt version 0.4, wayne, 16:18
- 4xx responses are now SHOULD, not MAY, Meng Weng Wong, 15:17
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:03
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:01
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, David Woodhouse, 05:54
April 08, 2004
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Greg Connor, 22:39
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Meng Weng Wong, 13:30
- RE: Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Seth Goodman, 07:58
- Re: Re: How to get listed at trusted-forwarder.org ?, wayne, 06:40
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 06:37
- Re: Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Greg Connor, 01:28
- Re: Re: How to get listed at trusted-forwarder.org ?, Greg Connor, 00:47
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Greg Connor, 00:40
April 07, 2004
- RE: more on Multiple classes of mail, Seth Goodman, 16:28
- more on Multiple classes of mail, Meng Weng Wong, 15:54
- Re: Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Meng Weng Wong, 10:50
- Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Jim Ramsay, 10:47
- Re: Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Meng Weng Wong, 10:28
- Re: Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Dustin D. Trammell, 09:23
- Re: How to get listed at trusted-forwarder.org ?, Philip Tucker, 09:09
- Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Jim Ramsay, 08:59
- RE: first class, second class, third class mail, Arnold K., 08:43
- RE: first class, second class, third class mail, Seth Goodman, 08:38
April 06, 2004
- Re: first class, second class, third class mail, Aredridel, 22:22
- Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Aredridel, 22:17
- RE: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Seth Goodman, 16:01
- SES and ABBS, Meng Weng Wong, 13:40
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:14
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:08
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:52
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, wayne, 12:40
- Re: shouldn't this pass?, Hector Santos, 12:36
- shouldn't this pass?, Mark Jeftovic, 12:17
- Re: Error looking up SPF record, Dustin D. Trammell, 12:11
- Some quick status info..., Dustin D. Trammell, 12:07
- Re: Here come the feds!, Dustin D. Trammell, 11:54
- Re: 10,000 Registrations, Dustin D. Trammell, 11:53
- RE: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Seth Goodman, 11:21
- RE: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Seth Goodman, 11:06
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 09:20
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Dan Boresjo, 09:15
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, marc, 08:33
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 08:31
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:56
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 06:31
- How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Roger Moser, 03:35
April 05, 2004
- How to get listed at trusted-forwarder.org ?, Joe Rhett, 23:35
- infinitepenguins.net is down, Nate Leon, 22:45
- Re: first class, second class, third class mail, Meng Weng Wong, 15:13
- Re: first class, second class, third class mail, Meng Weng Wong, 14:45
- getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Meng Weng Wong, 14:08
- Re: SV: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Kelson Vibber, 10:57
- SV: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Lars Dybdahl, 10:50
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Kelson Vibber, 09:41
- Re: Spf Problem with DRAC?, Joshue, 07:45
- RE: SV: 10,000 Registrations, Lyndon Eaton, 06:48
- Re: SV: 10,000 Registrations, Ian Castle, 01:28
April 04, 2004
- Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 04/05/04, Wayne Schlitt, 23:23
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Greg Connor, 16:19
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 15:27
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Greg Connor, 14:29
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 11:12
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Dave Crocker, 00:34
- Re: Invalid SPF record for seznam.cz, wayne, 00:15
April 03, 2004
- Re: RMSPF binaries, wayne, 23:39
- Invalid SPF record for seznam.cz, Roger Moser, 23:31
- RMSPF binaries, Roger Moser, 23:12
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Aredridel, 09:47
- SV: SV: 10,000 Registrations, spf-team, 07:38
- Re: SV: 10,000 Registrations, David Woodhouse, 07:25
- Re: SV: 10,000 Registrations, James Couzens, 06:49
- Re: SFBA: invitation to get-together june 3rd in san jose, Greg Connor, 05:15
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Greg Connor, 04:48
- SV: 10,000 Registrations, spf-team, 01:03
April 02, 2004
- SV: 10,000 Registrations, Lars Dybdahl, 22:19
- Re: Minimal SPF implementation for mail receivers., Stuart D. Gathman, 19:23
- Re: Minimal SPF implementation for mail receivers., Greg Wooledge, 19:05
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Kelson Vibber, 15:30
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, wayne, 15:27
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Dave Crocker, 15:16
- Re: Minimal SPF implementation for mail receivers., wayne, 14:16
- Re: 10,000 Registrations, wayne, 14:08
- Re: 10,000 Registrations, Mark Jeftovic, 14:06
- Re: Minimal SPF implementation for mail receivers., Meng Weng Wong, 14:04
- Re: Here come the feds!, marc, 13:57
- use SMTP AUTH!, Meng Weng Wong, 13:57
- Re: 10,000 Registrations, Meng Weng Wong, 13:53
- 10,000 Registrations, marc, 13:46
- SFBA: invitation to get-together june 3rd in san jose, Meng Weng Wong, 12:01
- Re: Here come the feds!, csm, 10:16
- Minimal SPF implementation for mail receivers., Stuart D. Gathman, 10:06
- Re: Here come the feds!, David Woodhouse, 09:34
- Re: question regarding large international organisations adoption of SPF, csm, 09:34
- Re: Here come the feds!, csm, 09:12
- Re: Here come the feds!, Alain Knaff, 08:20
- Here come the feds!, Meng Weng Wong, 08:16
- Re: question regarding large international organisations adoption of SPF, Paul Howarth, 03:42
- question regarding large international organisations adoption of SPF, Gabriel Granger, 03:29
April 01, 2004
- Re: Re: "SPF for Dummies" asked, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:40
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, David Woodhouse, 15:28
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, David Woodhouse, 14:22
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Hector Santos, 14:03
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, hamish, 12:46
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Greg Hewgill, 12:38
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Kelson Vibber, 10:35
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Ernesto Baschny, 10:31
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 10:18
- Re: Re: "SPF for Dummies" asked, James Couzens, 08:15
- Re: "SPF for Dummies" asked, Roger Moser, 07:09
- Re: Discussion of Email Caller ID Boycott, Nick Phillips, 01:36