Re: Whitelists instead of SRS

spf-discuss

2004-04-22 06:36:56

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Daniel Taylor wrote:


Current legitimate forwarders use forged "from" to accomplish
the forward and preserve bounce information.


That isn't forgery because the forwarder is acting legitimately on behalf
of the correspondents.

It is not possible to detect/eliminate the first without impacting
the second.


Incorrect. Signed sender addresses acheive this.

-- 
Tony Finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Theo Schlossnagle Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Theo Schlossnagle Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch <= Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Alain Knaff Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl Re: SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Alain Knaff RE: Whitelists instead of SRS, Seth Goodman SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl Re: SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker

Previous by Date:	Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Alain Knaff
Next by Date:	Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor
Previous by Thread:	Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor
Next by Thread:	Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]